A number of formal reviews at school and university level evaluate modules, programmes, school procedures and other issues.
After delivery, each module should be reviewed, using feedback and student achievement, and reported back to students to improve the module in future.
The Head of School (or nominee, usually the Director of Student Education) is responsible for ensuring that the processes of evaluation, review and reflection are undertaken, in line with university policy.
Student evaluation of a module is an essential part of module review. There are minimum requirements for evaluation surveys, including a set of core statements which must be included.
Module evaluation surveys at the University must include a set of core statements for students to respond to.
Every year, programme reviews take place using feedback from students, colleagues and external sources together with student progression and award data to plan improvement.
A collaborative provision arrangement is subject to a full review process within 6 months of its contract expiry date.
An Annual School Review (Student Education) will be organised by the Quality Assurance team each year to review the school's progress and the subsequent report will form part of the annual planning round.
Every six years, each school/unit has a Student Academic Experience Review to review the quality management procedures and quality of the student experience which will be reported on and monitored afterwards
The University has a process of regular review for institution-wide and School-based study abroad/Horizon year arrangements.