A number of formal reviews at school and university level evaluate modules, programmes, school procedures and other issues.
After delivery, each module should be reviewed by reflecting on the performance of the module in the light of student feedback. The reflection should be reported back to students and used to improve the module in future.
The Head of School (or nominee, usually the Director of Student Education) is responsible for ensuring that the processes of evaluation, review and reflection are undertaken, in line with university policy.
Student evaluation of a module is an essential part of module review. There are minimum requirements for module evaluation surveys, including a set of core statements to which students must respond.
Module evaluation surveys at the University must include a set of questions or ‘core statements’ to which students are required to respond as part of the survey.
Every year, programme reviews take place using feedback from students, colleagues and external sources together with student progression and award data to plan improvement.
A collaborative provision arrangement is subject to a full review process within 6 months of its contract expiry date.
An Annual School Review (Student Education) will be organised by the Quality Assurance team each year to review the school's progress and the subsequent report will form part of the annual planning round.
The University has a process of regular review for institution-wide and School-based study abroad/Horizon year arrangements.