Approval process overview
Compile full details of all new and amended modules and programmes before putting them forward for approval by the appropriate committees.
Approval processes and roles who does what
Formal approval involves several groups:
- The Portfolio Steering Group (PSG) ratifies the teaching portfolio, on behalf of the Senate.
- The School Taught Student Education Committees (STSECs) and Programme Approval Groups (PAGs) consider the detail of programmes and modules, on behalf of PSG.
- The school proposing the new or changed course is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of each proposal.
- The school and its STSEC ensure that proposals put forward for approval are correct and complete at the first presentation.
- PAGs oversee proposals and focus on selected academic elements, in particular, learning outcomes and methods of assessment.
The approval procedure for the different types of proposal are set out below.
You need full details of all new and amended modules and programmes before you put them forward for approval by the appropriate committees. New programmes and major programme amendments have a two-stage development and approval process - executive approval (stage 1) followed by full academic programme approval (stage 2).
Students will not be able to enrol on a module or register on a programme until it has been fully approved. A new programme should not be included in Integrated Planning Exercise (IPE) submissions until executive approval has been given.
New programmes: Require executive approval from the faculty executive before the proposal can be developed for full academic programme approval. New programmes are proposed by the STSEC, approved by the PAG, and ratified by PSG. The programme proposal requires full academic approval in advance of Coursefinder going live to take full advantage of the recruitment cycle. A Quality Check is undertaken at least 6 months before the programme commences (normally by the appropriate PAG). At the Quality Check any new constituent module proposals are approved, programme management arrangements are agreed, and the original programme documentation is reviewed to ensure that any issues have been addressed and all elements of the programme are fully aligned and deliverable.
Major programme amendments: involve changes to the structure of an existing programme which have the potential to impact on the programme level learning outcomes. See major programme amendment definition (PDF). Major programme amendments are proposed by the STSEC, approved by the PAG, and ratified by PSG.
Minor programme amendments: are approved by the STSEC and confirmed to FTSEC via the Report of STSEC Business and supporting STSEC minutes.
New modules: are proposed by the STSEC and approved by the PAG.
Module amendments: are approved by the STSEC and reported to FTSEC via the Report of STSEC business. If the proposed amendments include changes to the module learning outcomes, credit level or weighting you may need to propose a new module instead. Please speak to your Quality Assurance team (QAT) faculty contact who will advise on the proposal.
Deadlines and timescales
Full academic programme approval completed (after executive approval)
Quality Check and Review
|PAG meeting in Semester 2 (by end of January, 19 months before programme commences||PAG meeting or separate Quality Check meeting in Semester 2 (by March, 6 months before the programme commences)|
|PAG meeting 12-18 months before the programme commences.||PAG meeting or separate Quality Check meeting in Semester 2 (by March, 6 months before the programme commences)|
New programme proposals
Proposals for new undergraduate programmes need full academic approval in advance of UCAS going live, by the end of January 19 months before the programme commences. Proposals for new taught postgraduate programmes need full academic approval 12-18 months before the programme commences. Please speak to your Quality Assurance team (QAT) faculty contact who will advise on the proposal timescales.
Changes to modules and programmes
All changes to existing modules and programmes need to be completed by 31 March in the academic year before enrolment/registration. This is so the catalogues are accurate before online enrolment for returning students starts, in early May.
By 31 March the final versions of the module(s) or programme(s) must be entered into the catalogues and approved by the relevant committees. Schools may not normally make changes to the catalogues for the next session after this date, as the University must meet requirements for the Competition and Markets Authority.
Changes to existing provision during or after online enrolment
In exceptional circumstances, a school may need to make an urgent change to a module or programme after the 31 March deadline. This will only be allowed where the school can prove an urgent need for the change and students will not be disadvantaged. The Pro-Dean for Student Education in the Faculty or PAG Chair will need to consider the proposal for approval, ensuring the appropriate process has been followed:
- For existing modules, the school will inform all students enrolled on the module of the proposed changes, providing evidence of this and that students agreed to the change.
- For changes to existing programmes, the school will inform all students registered on the programme of the proposed changes, providing evidence of this and that students agreed to the change.
Changes to new programmes during the recruitment process
For any proposed changes to new programmes, you should seek advice from your QA Faculty contact as early as possible. These may then be considered by Chairs action or as part of the programmes Quality Check by the PAG. If approved, the relevant Faculty Admissions team will then contact all applicants to the programme to inform them of the changes and where appropriate, offer advice about alternative arrangements and the opportunity to withdraw.
Module and programme catalogues
The module and programme catalogues are the definitive source of information on the University's teaching portfolio. They contain the formal programme specifications. It is vital they are accurate because:
- students, examiners and others rely on the information in catalogues
- several other systems get their information from the catalogues, including:
- online enrolment and registration
- the Banner student records system
- University examinations
The School is responsible for ensuring that final details of all approved modules and programmes are entered into the catalogues following approval. This should be completed within 5 working days of the programme/module being approved.
Responsibility for accuracy
Schools and faculties are responsible for ensuring that the catalogue information is accurate and complete, and that information provided to staff and students by other means matches that in the catalogue. Students, examiners and others must be able to rely on the information published in the programme specifications.
Guidance and training for using the module and programme catalogues
Group training is organised by the SIMS team on selected dates throughout the year. Full information about these courses can be found on the IT website.
One to one sessions can be arranged throughout the year by contacting the Catalogue Manager.
Keep full records of all changes to a schools modules and programmes in the minutes of STSEC meetings. Following STSEC, a consolidated report of all module amendments and minor programme amendments that have been approved by STSEC (along with the STSEC minutes) will be submitted to the Quality Assurance team (QAT) faculty contact for reporting at the next FTSEC meeting.